SiSoftware Sandra Lite 2011 | ||
| 产品名称 | 联想T168 G7 | 宏碁AC100 |
| 平台类型 | 单路Intel SandyBridge | 单路Intel SandyBridge |
| Processor Arithmetic Benchmark 处理器算术运算测试 | ||
|---|---|---|
| 总计本地功效 | 66.59GOPS | 76.1GOPS |
| 总计本地功效对比速度 | 19.63MOPS/MHz | 23.11MOPS/MHz |
| Dhrystone iSSE4.2 | 97.37GIPS | 97.8GIPS |
| Dhrystone iSSE4.2 vs SPEED | 28.71MIPS/MHz | 29.70MIPS/MHz |
| Whetstone iSSE3 | 45.54GFLOPS | 59.22GFLOPS |
| Dhrystone iSSE3 vs SPEED | 13.43MFLOPS/MHz | 17.98MFLOPS/MHz |
| Processor Multi-Media Benchmark 处理器多媒体测试 | ||
| 总计多媒体功效 | 123.15MPixel/s | 125MPixel/s |
| 总计多媒体功效对比速度 | 36.31GOPS | 37.99kPixel/s/MHz |
| Multi-Media Int x16 iSSE4.1 | 149.37MPixel/s | 143.3MPixel/s |
| Multi-Media Int x16 iSSE4.1 vs SPEED | 44.04kPixels/s/MHz | 43.52kPixel/s/MHz |
| Multi-Media Float x8 iSSE2 | 101.53MPixel/s | 109.19MPixel/s |
| Multi-Media Float x8 iSSE2 vs SPEED | 29.93kPixels/s/MHz | 33.16kPixels/s/MHz |
| Multi-Media Double x4 iSSE2 | 55MPixel/s | 59.53MPixel/s |
| Multi-Media Double x4 iSSE2 vs SPEED | 16.24kPixels/s/MHz | 18.08kPixels/s/MHz |
| Multi-Core Efficiency Benchmark 处理器效能测试 | ||
| 内联核带宽 | 8.24GB/s | 12.15GB/s |
| 内联核带宽对比速度 | 2.49MB/s/MHz | 4.45MB/s/MHz |
| 内联核延迟(越小越好) | 42.4ns | 44.8ns |
| 内联核延迟对比速度(越小越好) | 0.13ns/MHz | 0.16ns/MHz |
| Java算数性能测试 | ||
| 总计 Java 功效 | 54.22GOPS | 52.82GOPS |
| 总计 Java 功效对比速度 | 15.98MOPSMHz | 16.04MOPSMHz |
| Dhrystone Java | 111GIPS | 91.3GIPS |
| Dhrystone Java对比速度 | 32.70MIPS/MHz | 27.72MIPS/MHz |
| Whetstone Java | 26.5GFLOPS | 30.56GFLOPS |
| Whetstone Java对比速度 | 7.81MFLOPSMHz | 9.28MFLOPS/MHz |
| Java多媒体性能测试 | ||
| 总计多媒体Java功效 | 16.88MPixel/s | 21.62MPixel/s |
| 总计多媒体Java功效对比速度 | 4.98kPixels/s/MHz | 7.74kPixels/s/MHz |
| 多媒体整数 x1 Java | 19.4MPixel/s | 21.16MPixel/s |
| 多媒体整数 x1 Java对比速度 | 5.72kPixels/s/MHz | 7.57kPixels/s/MHz |
| 多媒体浮点数 x1 Java | 14.69MPixel/s | 22MPixel/s |
| 多媒体浮点数 x1 Java对比速度 | 4.33kPixels/s/MHz | 7.91kPixels/s/MHz |
| 多媒体双精度 x1 Java | 14.75MPixel/s | 21MPixel/s |
| 多媒体双精度 x1 Java对比速度 | 4.35kPixels/s/MHz | 7.55kPixels/s/MHz |
| .NET Arithmetic Benchmark .NET算术运算测试 | ||
| 总计 .NET 功效 | 20.18GOPS | 21.83GOPS |
| 总计 .NET 功效对比速度 | 5.95MOPS/MHz | 6.63MOPS/MHz |
| Dhrystone .NET | 14.64GIPS | 12.93GIPS |
| Dhrystone .NET vs SPEED | 4.32MIPS/MHz | 3.89MIPS/MHz |
| Whetstone .NET | 27.82GFLOPS | 37.15GFLOPS |
| Whetstone .NET vs SPEED | 8.20MFLOPS/MHz | 11.28MFLOPS/MHz |
| .NET Multi-Media Benchmark .NET多媒体测试 | ||
| 总计多媒体.NET功效 | 14MPixel/s | 16.2MPixel/s |
| 总计多媒体.NET功效对比速度 | 4.14kPixels/MHz | 4.92kPixels/MHz |
| 多媒体整数 x1 .NET | 26.6MPixel/s | 26.77MPixel/s |
| 多媒体整数x1 .NET vs SPEED | 7.84kPixels/s/MHz | 8.13kPixels/s/MHz |
| 多媒体浮点数 x1 .NET | 7.4MPixel/s | 9.8MPixel/s |
| 多媒体浮点数 x1 .NET vs SPEED | 2.18kPixels/s/MHz | 2.98kPixels/s/MHz |
| 多媒体双精度 x1 .NET | 14.66MPixel/s | 19.27MPixel/s |
| 多媒体双精度 x1 .NET vs SPEED | 4.32kPixels/s/MHz | 5.85kPixels/s/MHz |
我们本次对比的宏碁AC100和联想T168 G7服务器看起来似乎联想所使用的E3-1220在主频上要高于宏碁AC100一些，3.1GHz相比2.4GHz的确有了不小的优势，但是结果很明显2.4GHz的宏碁AC100性能更为出色。原因在于E3-1260L虽然主频较低，但是提供了超线程技术的支持，有全部8个线程；而E3-1220只有4个。由此也可以说明，处理器主频并非是唯一因素，在架构相同的情况下，多线程也同样有性能的优势。
