服务器 频道

优异配置 惠普xw8600图形工作站评测

  SiSoftware Sandra Pro Business 2009

  SiSoftware Sandra是一款可运行在32bit和64bit Windows操作系统上的分析软件,这款软件可以对于系统进行方便、快捷的基准测试,还可以用于查看系统的软件、硬件等信息。从Sandra 2007开始支持SSE4指令集。SiSoftware Sandra所有的基准测试都针对SMP和SMT进行了优化,最高可支持32/64路平台,这也是我们选择这款软件的原因之一。

SiSoftware Sandra Pro Business 2009

测试对象

HP xw8600 Workstation
双路Intel Harpertown
Xeon E5430
2.66GHz

DELL PE 2900 III
双路Intel Harpertown
Xeon E5430
2.66GHz

Processor Arithmetic Benchmark
处理器架构测试

Dhrystone ALU

98048MIPS

91006MIPS

Dhrystone ALU vs SPEED

36.76MIPS/MHz

34.21MIPS/MHz

Whetstone iSSE3

72625MFLOPS

78385MFLOPS

Dhrystone iSSE3 vs SPEED

27.23MFLOPS/MHz

29.47MFLOPS/MHz

Processor Multi-Media Benchmark
处理器多媒体测试

Multi-Media Int x8 iSSE4.1

253.01MPixel/s

199.33MPixel/s

Multi-Media Int x8 iSSE4.1 vs SPEED

94.87kPixels/s/MHz

74.94kPixels/s/MHz

Multi-Media Float x4 iSSE2

169.32MPixel/s

108.69MPixel/s

Multi-Media Float x4 iSSE2 vs SPEED

63.49kPixels/s/MHz

40.86kPixels/s/MHz

Multi-Media Double x2 iSSE2

89.47MPixel/s

55.75MPixel/s

Multi-Media Double x2 iSSE2 vs SPEED

33.55kPixels/s/MHz

20.96kPixels/s/MHz

Multi-Core Efficiency Benchmark

Inter-Core Bandwidth

22.42GB/s

20.54GB/s

Inter-Core Bandwidth vs SPEED

8.61MB/s/MHz

7.91MB/s/MHz

Inter-Core Latency
(越小越好)

90ns

90ns

Inter-Core Latency vs SPEED
(越小越好)

0.03ns/MHz

0.03ns/MHz

Memory Bandwidth Benchmark
内存带宽测试

Int Buff'd iSSE2 Memory Bandwidth

4.14GB/s

6.13GB/s

Int Buff'd iSSE2 Memory Bandwidth vs SPEED

6.36MB/s/MHz

9.43MB/s/MHz

Float Buff'd iSSE2 Memory Bandwidth

4.14GB/s

6.13GB/s

Float Buff'd iSSE2 Memory Bandwidth vs SPEED

6.36MB/s/MHz

9.43MB/s/MHz

Memory Latency Benchmark
内存延迟测试

Memory(Random Access) Latency
(越小越好)

109ns

108ns

Memory(Random Access) Latency vs SPEED
(越小越好)

0.16ns/MHz

0.16ns/MHz

Speed Factor
(越小越好)

95.50

95.20

Internal Data Cache Latency
(越小越好)

3clocks

3clocks

L2 On-board Cache Latency
(越小越好)

18clocks

18clocks

Cache and Memory Benchmark
缓存及内存测试

Cache/Memory Bandwidth

79.01GB/s

68.88GB/s

Cache/Memory Bandwidth vs SPEED

30.34MB/s/MHz

26.52MB/s/MHz

Speed Factor

86.60

111.90

Internal Data Cache

419.51GB/s

421.23GB/s

L2 On-board Cache

140.91GB/s

122.68GB/s

Graphics Processing
图形处理性能

Native Float Shaders

133.71MPixel/s

 

Native Float Shaders vs SPEED

123.58kPixels/s/MHz

 

Emulated Double Shaders

12.68MPixel/s

 

Emulated Double Shaders vs SPEED

11.71kPixels/s/MHz

 

Graphics Bandwidth
图形带宽

Internal Memory Bandwidth

45.44GB/s

 

Internal Memory Bandwidth vs SPEED

66.28MB/s/MHz

 

Data Transfer Bandwidth

1.97GB/s

 

Data Transfer Bandwidth vs SPEED

2.88MB/s/MHz

 

Internal Memory Bandwidth

45.44GB/s 

Internal Memory Bandwidth Efficiency

69.04% 

System to Device Bandwidth

2.00GB/s 

System to Device Bandwidth Efficiency

51.07% 

Device to System Bandwidth

1.76GB/s

 

Device to System Bandwidth Efficiency

45.15%

 

SiSoftware Sandra对比

  HP xw8600工作站的处理器和内存都和我们的DELL PowerEdge 2900 III服务器相同,不过主板不一样,前者是Intel 5400,后者是5000X,前者带的Snoop Filter有24MB,后者只有16MB。从最终结果来看,整体性能均是xw8600工作站超出。

1
相关文章