SiSoftware Sandra Pro Business 2011 | ||
| 产品名称 | 联想T168 G7 | 富士通TX120 S3 |
| 平台类型 | 单路Intel SandyBridge | 单路Intel SandyBridge |
| Processor Arithmetic Benchmark 处理器算术运算测试 | ||
|---|---|---|
| 总计本地功效 | 66.59GOPS | 76.14GOPS |
| 总计本地功效对比速度 | 19.63MOPS/MHz | 23.12MOPS/MHz |
| Dhrystone iSSE4.2 | 97.37GIPS | 97.67GIPS |
| Dhrystone iSSE4.2 vs SPEED | 28.71MIPS/MHz | 29.66MIPS/MHz |
| Whetstone iSSE3 | 45.54GFLOPS | 59.36GFLOPS |
| Dhrystone iSSE3 vs SPEED | 13.43MFLOPS/MHz | 18.03MFLOPS/MHz |
| Processor Multi-Media Benchmark 处理器多媒体测试 | ||
| 总计多媒体功效 | 123.15MPixel/s | 125.15MPixel/s |
| 总计多媒体功效对比速度 | 36.31kPixels/s/MHz | 48.66kPixels/s/MHz |
| Multi-Media Int x16 iSSE4.1 | 149.37MPixel/s | 143.6MPixel/s |
| Multi-Media Int x16 iSSE4.1 vs SPEED | 44.04kPixels/s/MHz | 55.84kPixel/s/MHz |
| Multi-Media Float x8 iSSE2 | 101.53MPixel/s | 109MPixel/s |
| Multi-Media Float x8 iSSE2 vs SPEED | 29.93kPixels/s/MHz | 42.41kPixels/s/MHz |
| Multi-Media Double x4 iSSE2 | 55MPixel/s | 59.5MPixel/s |
| Multi-Media Double x4 iSSE2 vs SPEED | 16.24kPixels/s/MHz | 23.13kPixels/s/MHz |
| Multi-Core Efficiency Benchmark 处理器效能测试 | ||
| 内联核带宽 | 8.24GB/s | 17GB/s |
| 内联核带宽对比速度 | 2.49MB/s/MHz | 5.29MB/s/MHz |
| 内联核延迟(越小越好) | 42.4ns | 47.1ns |
| 内联核延迟对比速度(越小越好) | 0.13ns/MHz | 0.14ns/MHz |
| Java算数性能测试 | ||
| 总计 Java 功效 | 54.22GOPS | 58.4GOPS |
| 总计 Java 功效对比速度 | 15.98MOPS/MHz | 17.73MOPS/MHz |
| Dhrystone Java | 111GIPS | 95.74GIPS |
| Dhrystone Java对比速度 | 32.70MIPS/MHz | 29.07MIPS/MHz |
| Whetstone Java | 26.5GFLOPS | 35.62GFLOPS |
| Whetstone Java对比速度 | 7.81MFLOPSMHz | 10.82MFLOPS/MHz |
| Java多媒体性能测试 | ||
| 总计多媒体Java功效 | 16.88MPixel/s | 21.1MPixel/s |
| 总计多媒体Java功效对比速度 | 4.98kPixels/s/MHz | 7.55kPixels/s/MHz |
| 多媒体整数 x1 Java | 19.4MPixel/s | 21.1MPixel/s |
| 多媒体整数 x1 Java对比速度 | 5.72kPixels/s/MHz | 7.55kPixels/s/MHz |
| 多媒体浮点数 x1 Java | 14.69MPixel/s | 21.1MPixel/s |
| 多媒体浮点数 x1 Java对比速度 | 4.33kPixels/s/MHz | 7.55kPixels/s/MHz |
| 多媒体双精度 x1 Java | 14.75MPixel/s | 19MPixel/s |
| 多媒体双精度 x1 Java对比速度 | 4.35kPixels/s/MHz | 6.78kPixels/s/MHz |
| .NET Arithmetic Benchmark .NET算术运算测试 | ||
| 总计 .NET 功效 | 20.18GOPS | 21.8GOPS |
| 总计 .NET 功效对比速度 | 5.95MOPS/MHz | 6.62MOPS/MHz |
| Dhrystone .NET | 14.64GIPS | 12.85GIPS |
| Dhrystone .NET vs SPEED | 4.32MIPS/MHz | 3.90MIPS/MHz |
| Whetstone .NET | 27.82GFLOPS | 37GFLOPS |
| Whetstone .NET vs SPEED | 8.20MFLOPS/MHz | 11.23MFLOPS/MHz |
| .NET Multi-Media Benchmark .NET多媒体测试 | ||
| 总计多媒体.NET功效 | 14MPixel/s | 16.2MPixel/s |
| 总计多媒体.NET功效对比速度 | 4.14kPixels/MHz | 4.92kPixels/s/MHz |
| 多媒体整数 x1 .NET | 26.6MPixel/s | 26.76MPixel/s |
| 多媒体整数x1 .NET vs SPEED | 7.84kPixels/s/MHz | 8.13kPixels/s/MHz |
| 多媒体浮点数 x1 .NET | 7.4MPixel/s | 9.81MPixel/s |
| 多媒体浮点数 x1 .NET vs SPEED | 2.18kPixels/s/MHz | 2.98kPixels/s/MHz |
| 多媒体双精度 x1 .NET | 14.66MPixel/s | 19.18MPixel/s |
| 多媒体双精度 x1 .NET vs SPEED | 4.32kPixels/s/MHz | 5.83kPixels/s/MHz |
从成绩来看，虽然至强E3-1260L在主频上落后于我们对比的产品，但在实际测试中的表现却并不差。甚至有些项目还超越了E3-1220的性能，归根结底还是超线程在其中起到的作用。
