SiSoftware Sandra Pro Business 2011 | ||
产品名称 | 联想T168 G7 | 曙光I210r-G |
平台类型 | 单路Intel SandyBridge | 单路Intel SandyBridge |
Processor Arithmetic Benchmark 处理器算术运算测试 | ||
---|---|---|
总计本地功效 | 66.59GOPS | 111.14GOPS |
总计本地功效对比速度 | 19.63MOPS/MHz | 27.85MOPS/MHz |
Dhrystone iSSE4.2 | 97.37GIPS | 144.43GIPS |
Dhrystone iSSE4.2 vs SPEED | 28.71MIPS/MHz | 36.19MIPS/MHz |
Whetstone iSSE3 | 45.54GFLOPS | 85.52GFLOPS |
Dhrystone iSSE3 vs SPEED | 13.43MFLOPS/MHz | 21.43MFLOPS/MHz |
Processor Multi-Media Benchmark 处理器多媒体测试 | ||
总计多媒体功效 | 123.15MPixel/s | 185.39MPixel/s |
总计多媒体功效对比速度 | 36.31kPixels/s/MHz | 46.45kPixels/s/MHz |
Multi-Media Int x16 iSSE4.1 | 149.37MPixel/s | 212.78MPixel/s |
Multi-Media Int x16 iSSE4.1 vs SPEED | 44.04kPixels/s/MHz | 53.31kPixel/s/MHz |
Multi-Media Float x8 iSSE2 | 101.53MPixel/s | 161.52MPixel/s |
Multi-Media Float x8 iSSE2 vs SPEED | 29.93kPixels/s/MHz | 40.47kPixels/s/MHz |
Multi-Media Double x4 iSSE2 | 55MPixel/s | 88.12MPixel/s |
Multi-Media Double x4 iSSE2 vs SPEED | 16.24kPixels/s/MHz | 22.08kPixels/s/MHz |
Multi-Core Efficiency Benchmark 处理器效能测试 | ||
内联核带宽 | 8.24GB/s | 21.45GB/s |
内联核带宽对比速度 | 2.49MB/s/MHz | 5.50MB/s/MHz |
内联核延迟(越小越好) | 42.4ns | 37.4ns |
内联核延迟对比速度(越小越好) | 0.13ns/MHz | 0.09ns/MHz |
Java算数性能测试 | ||
总计 Java 功效 | 54.22GOPS | 84.1GOPS |
总计 Java 功效对比速度 | 15.98MOPSMHz | 21.07MOPSMHz |
Dhrystone Java | 111GIPS | 135.28GIPS |
Dhrystone Java对比速度 | 32.70MIPS/MHz | 33.90MIPS/MHz |
Whetstone Java | 26.5GFLOPS | 52.29GFLOPS |
Whetstone Java对比速度 | 7.81MFLOPSMHz | 13.10MFLOPS/MHz |
Java多媒体性能测试 | ||
总计多媒体Java功效 | 16.88MPixel/s | 31.52MPixel/s |
总计多媒体Java功效对比速度 | 4.98kPixels/s/MHz | 7.90kPixels/s/MHz |
多媒体整数 x1 Java | 19.4MPixel/s | 30.7MPixel/s |
多媒体整数 x1 Java对比速度 | 5.72kPixels/s/MHz | 7.69kPixels/s/MHz |
多媒体浮点数 x1 Java | 14.69MPixel/s | 32.35MPixel/s |
多媒体浮点数 x1 Java对比速度 | 4.33kPixels/s/MHz | 8.11kPixels/s/MHz |
多媒体双精度 x1 Java | 14.75MPixel/s | 27.87MPixel/s |
多媒体双精度 x1 Java对比速度 | 4.35kPixels/s/MHz | 6.98kPixels/s/MHz |
.NET Arithmetic Benchmark .NET算术运算测试 | ||
总计 .NET 功效 | 20.18GOPS | 31.85GOPS |
总计 .NET 功效对比速度 | 5.95MOPS/MHz | 8.19MOPS/MHz |
Dhrystone .NET | 14.64GIPS | 19GIPS |
Dhrystone .NET vs SPEED | 4.32MIPS/MHz | 4.87MIPS/MHz |
Whetstone .NET | 27.82GFLOPS | 53.51GFLOPS |
Whetstone .NET vs SPEED | 8.20MFLOPS/MHz | 13.75MFLOPS/MHz |
.NET Multi-Media Benchmark .NET多媒体测试 | ||
总计多媒体.NET功效 | 14MPixel/s | 23.67MPixel/s |
总计多媒体.NET功效对比速度 | 4.14kPixels/MHz | 5.93kPixels/s/MHz |
多媒体整数 x1 .NET | 26.6MPixel/s | 39.56MPixel/s |
多媒体整数x1 .NET vs SPEED | 7.84kPixels/s/MHz | 9.91kPixels/s/MHz |
多媒体浮点数 x1 .NET | 7.4MPixel/s | 14.17MPixel/s |
多媒体浮点数 x1 .NET vs SPEED | 2.18kPixels/s/MHz | 3.55kPixels/s/MHz |
多媒体双精度 x1 .NET | 14.66MPixel/s | 28.22MPixel/s |
多媒体双精度 x1 .NET vs SPEED | 4.32kPixels/s/MHz | 7.07kPixels/s/MHz |
应该说,主频和超线程的提升对于系统来讲至关重要,同样系列的处理器,E3-1290相比E3-1220而言在整体性能上有50%以上的提升,部分项目的提升超过了200%甚至300%。虽然看起来主频只提升了0.4GHz,但超线程的出现使得这种提升呈几何形的放大趋势,13%的主频提升实现了50%以上的性能,这些都是超线程的功劳。