服务器 频道

专业设计之选 戴尔T5500双路工作站评测

  SiSoftware Sandra是一款可运行在32bit和64bit Windows操作系统上的分析软件,这款软件可以对于系统进行方便、快捷的基准测试,还可以用于查看系统的软件、硬件等信息。从Sandra 2007开始支持SSE4指令集。SiSoftware Sandra所有的基准测试都针对SMP和SMT进行了优化,最高可支持32/64路平台,这也是我们选择这款软件的原因之一。

SiSoftware Sandra Pro Business 2009

测试对象

DELL Precision T5500

HP xw8600 Workstation

Processor Arithmetic Benchmark
处理器架构测试

Dhrystone ALU

138679MIPS

98048MIPS

Dhrystone ALU vs SPEED

52.13MIPS/MHz

36.76MIPS/MHz

Whetstone iSSE3

121017MFLOPS

72625MFLOPS

Dhrystone iSSE3 vs SPEED

45.50MFLOPS/MHz

27.23MFLOPS/MHz

Processor Multi-Media Benchmark
处理器多媒体测试

Multi-Media Int x8 iSSE4.1

284.58MPixel/s

253.01MPixel/s

Multi-Media Int x8 iSSE4.1 vs SPEED

106.99kPixels/s/MHz

94.87kPixels/s/MHz

Multi-Media Float x4 iSSE2

217.19MPixel/s

169.32MPixel/s

Multi-Media Float x4 iSSE2 vs SPEED

81.65kPixels/s/MHz

63.49kPixels/s/MHz

Multi-Media Double x2 iSSE2

119.23MPixel/s

89.47MPixel/s

Multi-Media Double x2 iSSE2 vs SPEED

44.82kPixels/s/MHz

33.55kPixels/s/MHz

Multi-Core Efficiency Benchmark

Inter-Core Bandwidth

69.66GB/s

22.42GB/s

Inter-Core Bandwidth vs SPEED

26.82MB/s/MHz

8.61MB/s/MHz

Inter-Core Latency
(越小越好)

17ns

90ns

Inter-Core Latency vs SPEED
(越小越好)

0.01ns/MHz

0.03ns/MHz

Memory Bandwidth Benchmark
内存带宽测试

Int Buff'd iSSE2 Memory Bandwidth

15.08GB/s

4.14GB/s

Int Buff'd iSSE2 Memory Bandwidth vs SPEED

-

6.36MB/s/MHz

Float Buff'd iSSE2 Memory Bandwidth

15.08GB/s

4.14GB/s

Float Buff'd iSSE2 Memory Bandwidth vs SPEED

-

6.36MB/s/MHz

Memory Latency Benchmark
内存延迟测试

Memory(Random Access) Latency
(越小越好)

114ns

109ns

Memory(Random Access) Latency vs SPEED
(越小越好)

-

0.16ns/MHz

Speed Factor
(越小越好)

78.00

95.50

Internal Data Cache Latency
(越小越好)

4clocks

3clocks

L2 On-board Cache Latency
(越小越好)

10clocks

18clocks

Cache and Memory Benchmark
缓存及内存测试

Cache/Memory Bandwidth

128.85GB/s

79.01GB/s

Cache/Memory Bandwidth vs SPEED

49.60MB/s/MHz

30.34MB/s/MHz

Speed Factor

25.70

86.60

Internal Data Cache

424.43GB/s

419.51GB/s

L2 On-board Cache

395.93GB/s

140.91GB/s

Graphics Processing
图形处理性能

Native Float Shaders

537.10MPixel/s

133.71MPixel/s

Native Float Shaders vs SPEED

542.11kPixels/s/MHz

123.58kPixels/s/MHz

Emulated Double Shaders

-

12.68MPixel/s

Emulated Double Shaders vs SPEED

-

11.71kPixels/s/MHz

Graphics Bandwidth
图形带宽

Internal Memory Bandwidth

78.03GB/s

45.44GB/s

Internal Memory Bandwidth vs SPEED

-

66.28MB/s/MHz

Data Transfer Bandwidth

9.25GB/s

1.97GB/s

Data Transfer Bandwidth vs SPEED

-

2.88MB/s/MHz

Internal Memory Bandwidth

78.03GB/s45.44GB/s

Internal Memory Bandwidth Efficiency

-69.04%

System to Device Bandwidth

9.58GB/s2.00GB/s

System to Device Bandwidth Efficiency

61.30%51.07%

Device to System Bandwidth

6.34GB/s

1.76GB/s

Device to System Bandwidth Efficiency

40.57%

45.15%

  受益于Nehalem-EP处理器的优势,Precision T5500在大多数项目中的成绩都领先于对比平台,在处理器和内存的相关测试中表现得更为明显。由于处理器的差异,两者测试的项目并不完全对等,有些项目Nehalem-EP没有相关的测试成绩。不过由此看出,在使用QPI架构、内置三通道DDR3内存控制器之后,新一代的Precision T5500工作站相比老款的至强5400系列来说有了明显的提升,个别项目性能翻倍。

1
相关文章